I am a South African and I am proud to be a South African. Yet, there are times when I am not proud to be one. Right now, looking at the red card infringements committed in two successive games by our rugby players, I can honestly say that it is not a proud moment in South African rugby.
Neither of these two incidents were spotted by the refs and these players were cited after the matches for dangerous play. Last week, Bakkies Botha was cited for a head butt of all things, and has been banned for 9 weeks, which effectively makes him ineligible for the rest of the Tri-Nations rugby series. Yesterday, Jean de Villiers was cited for a spear tackle and received a 2 week ban.
Bakkies Botha head butt
Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a video of de Villiers’ spear tackle, but I was wondering why the ref didn’t blow him up for that tackle. I saw it happening, and wondered.
Here is my recommendation for infringements worthy of a red on the field. If the infringement was seen by the ref and a red card was issued, the team that the infringing player comes from would have played with 14 players for the rest of the match. Hence, in the case of Bakkies Botha’s infringement, it was committed in the opening minute of the game, and if red-carded, the Springboks would have played for 79 minutes with only 14 players. So, as a result, the Springboks played with the benefit of a player that should not have been on the field!
- should then start their next match without that player and with only 14 players on the field,
- the team must start with exactly the same team as the match of the infringement, without the banned player. This will ensure that the coach cannot move players around to somehow compensate for the loss of that one player, and
- only players that were genuinely injured in the previous match may be replaced, and only by the players that were on the bench during the previous match.
Of course, more rules can be added for red cards and citings that lead to bans, such as players that receive a red card and/or is banned 3 or more times in a period of 365 days, is automatically banned from playing any rugby for the next 365 days.
It is clear that players are not disciplined enough to check themselves during games, and if such stringent measures are taken against infringers, it may just cause these players to think twice (or even three times) before doing irresponsible and stupid things on the field. Another effect it may have is that coaches will also start taking responsibility for the type of players they choose for the teams. Then, perhaps, these types of players (the habitual offenders like Bakkies Botha) will be excluded from the team even before they can cause more damage on the field. Botha "had just returned to rugby after serving a four-match suspension for a reckless charge which kept him out of this year’s Super 14 play-offs," says the Mail&Guardian.
So, what do you think?